For those who can help..

New StandByDaniel Video: 'DANIEL RETURNS' (June 2018)

Who is Daniel Smith?

This Preview will bring you up to speed about a decade-long, Federal-storm-trooper assault on a humble, caring soul who sought only to help disease-stricken fellow humans worldwide.

Why Daniel Smith has become a hero for tens of thousands of suffering people throughout the globe: Daniel founded Project Green Life (PGL), an alternative health association that made the first professional grade MMS (Master Mineral Solution)  ~ making it available in over 160 countries between 2007 and 2011.

Out of the blue the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) began warning Daniel that they wanted the distribution of MMS to stop - immediately. Following legal consultation, Daniel wrote the FDA explaining how MMS was improving the health of multitudes around the world and asked them why they were making this demand. Silence. Daniel sent the document again. Continued silence. Daniel repeated a third time.

Rather than responding, the FDA initiated a year-long clandestine reconnaissance mission for the purpose of secretly securing search and seizure warrants aimed at putting PGL out of business in one fail swoop. It became obvious that this pursuit by the FDA was another example of a plethora of similar militant assaults on other Alternative Health companies and practitioners and in truth was a part of the agency's ongoing war against health freedom. In Daniel’s case they threatened him with 38 years in a Federal prison figuring Daniel would immediately close Project Green Life and thus block the distribution of MMS ever again.

Even though hundreds of users of MMS wrote the FDA declaring praises for the efficacy of MMS the FDA continued and intensified their unconstitutional actions. Daniel was arrested and charged with six felonies along with his wife and two employees. For what you ask? Helping people to get well.

Following a mockery of a trial in which Daniel was forbidden by the Judge to put on a defense he was convicted and sentenced to 51 months in a Federal Penitentiary. Even with this travesty-of-justice punishment the Prosecutor argued with the Judge demanding Daniel be sentenced to Life in Prison.

As you look through this fact-filled blog ( you’ll suspect a scheming collusion between the FDA and gigantic International Pharmaceutical entities. Daniel was portrayed as a conniving, evil, greedy Snake-Oil profiteer. One Federal employee even said, "I consider you a Domestic Terrorist!" Really? C’mon. Get real.

Truth is stranger than fiction. Right? This blog ~ ~ will answer this query.

Who Killed Sylvia Fink?
by Daniel Smith

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that mainstream media will never report the truth about MMS. But surely a rocket scientist could help the media appear more credible; after all, who doesn't believe a rocket scientist?

Perhaps that's what ABC producers were thinking when they aired their recent 20/20 "hit piece" featuring retired NASA scientist Doug Nash decrying that his wife of five years, Sylvia Fink, was killed by MMS in 2009.

But then again, was she? After more than seven years of my own silence since Sylvia's tragic death, its time for some truth-telling.

Isn't it significant that, in the past ten years, MMS has been used in over 160 countries by hundreds of thousands of people, and yet there has been only one alleged death attributed to its use?

And isn't it interesting that this death happened on a sailboat near "an isolated island ... in the far Western Pacific ... a place with no doctors present ... no significant medical facilities ... and no capability at all for dealing with the kind of toxic poisoning ... Sylvia was experiencing"? Those were Nash's words in a MedWatch report submitted to the FDA over the Internet on August 4, 2010 - a full year after Sylvia's death.

According to various newsclips published over the last few years, Nash met Sylvia in Mexico and invited her to join him on his sailboat. They were later allegedly married, though details in the media are sketchy.

According to previously non-published information, friends of Sylvia described her as a warm and loving woman who struggled with a sort of "hypochondria". Traveling abroad, particularly in tropical zones, Sylvia was especially anxious of contracting malaria. Friends report that leading up to her tragic passing, Sylvia had been self-medicating with increasing amounts of potent anti-malaria medication she and Nash acquired without prescription from Peace Corps workers.

Witnesses wrote in an affidavit that Sylvia had been complaining of not feeling well for several weeks leading up to her death; that even the night prior she had to excuse herself from a beach party, white as a ghost, having trouble speaking and breathing, as if she were not getting enough oxygen.

Witnesses attest that Sylvia was not in perfect health at the time of her death, contrary to what Nash has repeatedly told the media and authorities. Far from it. It was for this very reason she and Nash called Sylvia’s friends on the radio the next morning to inquire how to mix the MMS - to see if it might help with what was mysteriously ailing Sylvia.

Sylvia's friends carefully advised the couple on how to properly use MMS, beginning with one or two drops at the very most. Only Nash was present when the MMS was mixed but ten hours would transpire between the time it was administered and the time Nash would finally call friends over the radio exclaiming something was terribly wrong with Sylvia.

By the time Sylvia's friends arrived, she was unresponsive, and they immediately began attempts to revive her. When they asked Nash how much MMS Sylvia had taken, he stumbled, unsure, commenting to the effect, "knowing Sylvia, more was always better." Nash would tell the FDA a year later, however, that Sylvia died "twelve hours after ingesting two drops of MMS mixed in lime juice - the initial dose recommended in Jim Humble's protocol." The question arises: how was Nash able to recall such a specific and important detail twelve months later, but not the same day of Sylvia's death?

Noticing numerous prescription bottles and Panadol strewn on a nearby table, Sylvia's friends asked why Nash had not been forthright when they previously asked what medications Sylvia was taking. His answer was unclear. While Sylvia's friends tried frantically to revive her, Nash stood calmly in the background taking photos. This deeply troubled Sylvia's friends who asked him to put the camera down.

Documents later revealed, after receiving the autopsy report, Nash argued with the coroners in an effort to get them to alter the report and pin Sylvia's death on MMS, which they refused to do. The most the coroner would say was that Sylvia appeared to have died from complications stemming from methemaglobanemia (met-hemaglob-anemia), meaning that oxygen was not being carried by her red blood cells, eventually leading to the shutdown of her vital organs.

But here's the clincher: excessive use of anti-malaria medication notoriously causes methemaglobanemia. It is a well-known fact; one certainly your average seafaring NASA scientist would know. It was no wonder Nash showed significant knowledge on the subject while arguing with the coroner. One news piece reveals that Nash admitted to having medical literature of this nature on board his vessel at the time of Sylvia's death.

There are a number of questions any detective worth their salt should be asking about now. For example:

Why would a well-traveled, well-informed NASA scientist, with access to medical literature, not be aware of the dangers of, but rather encourage his wife's excessive use of dangerous, non-prescribed anti-malaria medication?

When Nash began to notice his wife's health declining after taking these medications in the weeks prior - exhibiting symptoms that others readily recognized as being related to lack of oxygen - why did he not intervene?

Why was he not forthcoming with Sylvia's friends about the drugs Sylvia was taking when first asked?

Why did he wait ten hours until Sylvia had lost all ability to communicate before calling her friends for help?

Why was he calmly taking photos rather than helping Sylvia's friends revive his own wife?

How did he have enough knowledge to argue with the coroner about methemaglobanemia, but not enough to stop Sylvia's excessive, non-medically prescribed use of drugs notoriously known to cause it?

Why did he not tell the coroner that Sylvia was using these drugs, arguing instead that MMS was the culprit?

When the coroners did not side with Nash, why did Nash immediately contact local media to launch a campaign against MMS? Why was it more important to implicate MMS than take time to grieve?

Why did he tell Sylvia's friends he didn't know how much MMS she had taken (but that it might have been more than she should have) - before the autopsy - yet told the FDA a year later - after the autopsy and after the case was officially closed - that she took only two drops mixed in lime juice?

Who mixed and administered the dose of MMS on that fateful day when Sylvia's health was so obviously compromised she could barely breathe?

Why has Nash never told authorities or the media that Sylvia was self-medicating with potent anti-malaria medications at the time of her death?

Why does Nash hold to the scientifically impossible... i.e., that two drops of MMS killed his wife twelve hours later?

Is it because he knows Sylvia unwittingly used significantly more activated MMS than she believed or thought she was using - more than anyone would ever need or want to use - just as she unwittingly was using more anti-malarial medication and Panadol than anyone should ever use - especially without a prescription - quantities any scientist, with even a limited knowledge of methemaglobanemia and contraindications, should know could send anyone as compromised as Sylvia already was, into a spiraling crisis from whence she could never hope to return?

Is it because no one would be the wiser because it happened near "an isolated island ... in the far Western Pacific ... a place with no doctors present ... no significant medical facilities ... and no capability at all for dealing with the kind of toxic poisoning ... Sylvia was experiencing"?

What kind of "toxic poisoning" was Sylvia really experiencing?

It begs the question, did Sylvia Fink have a life insurance policy, and if so, who was the beneficiary?

Doug Nash has not been truthful with the world, and its time for the world to know. I would be remiss to allow Mr. Nash to continue this charade that has served only to insulate himself from further investigation, while leaving a scarlet letter on the MMS movement that I know from personal first-hand knowledge has saved countless lives. Many people in this world are suffering and Mr. Nash's omissions may be costing the lives of other Sylvias.

I would be remiss to let ABC off the hook as well. ABC reported in an accompanying article that a "'concentrate solution' of sodium chlorite - the main ingredient in MMS - was found in her system." It is scientifically impossible that sodium chlorite could have ever been found in Sylvia's system two hours, let alone two weeks, after her death when an autopsy was finally done - especially if she ingested only "two drops of MMS mixed in lime juice", which would have immediately altered the composition of the MMS leaving behind no sodium chlorite. The autopsy report does not even imply such an aberration of chemical science. These are bald-faced lies extolled by Nash and ABC, both who have their own stories to sell, and their own reasons for people to buy into them.

Perhaps the reason authorities have, so far, done nothing, is because Nash's version of the story better fits the original investigating agency's agenda (FDA)? Perhaps Nash knew this and that is why he reached out to them? But if I were a supervisor for the DOJ, I would be concerned - for the sake of public confidence in the criminal justice system - that certain agents and attorneys deliberately withheld the above information when feeding Nash's story to a grand jury.

To be fair, I cannot say with personal firsthand knowledge that Nash knowingly and intentionally played a role in Sylvia's tragic passing, but I can say, with utmost certainty, that any scientist who is also a sailor in the tropics and has knowledge sufficient to argue with a coroner about methemaglobanemia, knows full well the dangers of anti-malaria medications and that Sylvia's passing could not have been caused by two drops of MMS mixed in lime juice.

I know for certain that if my wife lie unconscious, our friends trying desperately to revive her, I would not be memorializing the tragedy with photographs as if I were more interested in the story I wanted the photos to tell than in the looming loss of my closest companion. I know for certain that I would not have withheld from authorities my wife's use of methemaglobanemia-inducing drugs leading up to her death resulting from the same - unless I had something to hide.

With that, we should leave the answer to the question of what (or who) killed Sylvia Fink to the authorities and not to mainstream media - or rocket scientists - lest we leave it to the court of public opinion as ABC and Nash have so negligently and intentionally done already.

So Why Now?

Why did I not come forward with this information sooner - in the last seven years?

First, the last thing I would ever want to do is falsely accuse an innocent and grieving husband. Over time, however, I came to see that none of Doug Nash's actions were congruent with those of a grieving husband, but rather someone actively engaged in a campaign of misdirection.

Second, I did not want to dishonor Sylvia, or Sylvia's children, who've suffered enough by having to see their mother's name and the heart-breaking details exploited by the media. After seven years, however, I have come to believe that Sylvia and Sylvia's children deserve the truth to be told.

Third, I have felt compelled to honor the privacy of those who were witnesses to these tragic events, which I can only imagine trigger painful and traumatic memories. These beautiful friends of Sylvia, whose boat was always close by, were only called on by Nash after Sylvia had lost consciousness, when it would be too late to ask her questions or call for medical help. I suspect they were used by Nash as "MMS scapegoats", witnesses to a good-faith effort to revive Sylvia, and to play a role in his photo shoot for proof. I trust they understand I mean them no harm in disclosing what I have at this time. I can only trust they were guided by the Hand of Providence to provide a copy of their affidavit for such a time as this.

Finally, I have wondered... who would listen to a convicted felon anyway? But I'm over that. And there's still a chance for reversal, in spite of ABC's best (and worst) efforts. If there is one thing this journey has taught me... that is that truth and love endures forever - and nothing else matters. Truly, nothing. The world needs the truth right now, more than ever, and if ABC and Nash won't tell it, I will.

I pray that my disclosure has been the right thing ... for Sylvia, her family, her friends, and for all the world. May you rest in peace Sylvia.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

ABC's Disingenuous Search for "Proof"

That ABC was never looking for proof that MMS might be safe or efficacious is evident not only by its failure to vet Nash's story, but also by its gorilla interview tactics of Jim Humble and Mark Grenon. But even moreso, it is evident by the fact that ABC willfully and negligently failed to report several material facts.

First, ABC Producer Cyndi Galli admitted in October 2015 that she had received hundreds of testimonial emails from MMS users around the world reporting that MMS had helped them with various life-threatening conditions without any harmful side effects. She acknowledged the existence of a disconnect between what actual consumers were reporting and what the government was alleging. But did ABC interview a single person who submitted their testimony? Of course not; they weren't looking for that kind of proof.

ABC producers also failed to mention that sodium chlorite (the only ingredient in MMS other than water) was granted "orphaned drug status" by drug authorities of the European Union in 2013 for the treatment of ALS - amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

ABC producers also failed to mention that sodium chlorite, as of 2013, had already entered third-stage clinicals in the U.S. for the treatment of ALS, MS - multiple sclerosis), Parkinson's and Alzheimer's.

ABC also failed to mention the innumerable patents filed with the U.S. Patent Office pertaining to the the safe and effective use of acidified sodium chlorite in the treatment of HIV - human immunodeficiency virus, cancers (including breast cancer), dermatological issues, and various infectious diseases.

David Perlmutter, M.D., recently wrote, in his book "Brain Maker" (2015) about the link between digestive microflora and various neurological conditions including Autism, MS, ALS, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and even Tourettes - all believed to be irreversible by "modern" medicine. In his book, however, Dr. Perlmutter describes how various of these conditions - including Autism - have been reversed by protocols modifying digestive microflora.

This is not unlike the work of Kerry Rivera who has reported numerous reversals of autistic symptoms with the use of MMS which, likewise, alters the microflora.

To be clear, Dr. Perlmutter does not discuss MMS or sodium chlorite, nor do I imagine he would risk his medical career with the hounds of media by even suggesting it. Still, Dr. Perlmutter's work does clearly show that our microbiomes play a significant role in brain chemistry and, especially, neurological diseases previously thought to be "incurable".

Rather than probe into or acknowledge such numerous examples of safety and efficacy of sodium chlorite (MMS) to inexpensively address numerous health challenges, ABC dons a disingenuous title of "investigative journalist." It is clear their purpose here is only to tow the government line.

ABC's Consumer Reporting department can be seen routinely following DOJ cases and parroting the Department without any real investigation into the veracity of its claims.

For example, one ABC interviewee posited that the use of MMS could be likened unto putting Chlorox (a century-old brand of household bleach) in your water and drinking it - as if that were completely preposterous. Notwithstanding the chemistry (i.e., oxidizing mechanism of acidified MMS, is incredibly different from that of Chlorox (sodium hypochlorite bleach containing several other chemicals), ABC and its interviewee neglect the fact that the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency),, CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), and FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) have all suggested that people may use Chlorox to purify their water in a pinch. Yes... that dreadful stuff that turns your blue jeans white. <Aghast!>

ABC has egg on its face. Its abused its powerful position in the media to support a state-sponsored corporate agenda absent legitimate investigation and fair reporting. Moreover, it ignores the very "consumers" it alleges to be looking out for. ABC's brand is worthless if the best it can do is parrot a controlled conversation scripted by the state which, by the way, is the very definition of "propaganda". Perhaps this response would have been better titled: "The ABC's of Propaganda."

A Word About "The Six Million Dollar Men"

ABC billed myself (Daniel Smith) as a distributor of MMS who was "in it for the money", exhibiting a blurred-out eight year-old email between myself and my father; Subject: "The Six Million Dollar Men." I can only chuckle at the irony.

When I was just a boy, my Dad and I would watch a TV show together about a fictitious "bionically" enhanced superhero, Steve Austin, "The Six Million Dollar Man". My Dad was always strong as an ox; no one could beat him at arm-wrestling. Us kids affectionately called him the Six Million Dollar Man.

Later in life, when his health and strength were failing, I encouraged him as an avid researcher and past author to look into MMS... to try it... and, if he liked what he learned, and experienced, to write about it. In that email, I seized upon a 35+ year-old childhood memory to encourage him, stating that together we could be "The Six Million Dollar Men."

My Dad, Larry Smith, did try MMS, and it helped, and ten years later he is still with us. He went on to write several helpful books about MMS, published in different languages, that helped many people learn how to safely use MMS in the privacy of their own homes. No one has ever made six million dollars selling MMS that I know of but one can easily see how the pharmaceutical industry could lose a hundred times that because of MMS. And therein lies the rub.

After ten added years of productivity because of MMS and his renewed passion to help others, my Dad is again not doing so well. These events have taken allot out of him and he is weary. At present, his heart is operating at only 30% and there is a high likelihood, short of a miracle, we could lose him before I go home.

Whatever happens, I am proud of - and love - my Dad. He has remained my strongest supporter. I will forever be grateful that he and Mom chose to adopt me when I was just one year old. As a retired minister and couples counselor, my father leaves behind a legacy of having helped thousands, both spiritually and physically, all around the world. We all thank you, Dad. You will always be, to me, the Six Million Dollar Man.

With that, I'll close by expressing my personal and very genuine thanks for all those who have played and continue to play their roles in this drama, including ABC producers and Doug Nash; for without you, I may have lost sight of the greater duty I owe humanity: to stand for truth - even in adversity - and regardless of what those still caught in a fading paradigm may think. Thank you for holding me to my Life Contracts.

Love and Light,

Daniel Smith




The Story of Daniel’s Stand for Health Freedom (02-02-2015)

Please watch

In late 2007, when Daniel Smith became aware of an inexpensive and natural water purifying substance having a positive impact on Malaria in Africa, he left his career in technology and founded Project GreenLife in hopes to make a difference in the human health experience.

The effectiveness of this water purifier can be seen in the Ugandan pilot project video posted directly below.

daniel smith family

Daniel is facing 37 years in prison for helping save lives and defending our Health Freedom.  

After he helped tens of thousands of people all around the world, the FDA raided his organization, seized his assets, handcuffed and forcibly removed both he and his wife from their home in front of their eight-year old daughter, threw them in jail, threatened his family and slandered them in the media – all to demoralize them, taint any future jury, and decrease their chances of winning.

But Daniel has not given up.  He can still win – with our support. Learn more about Daniel’s story below and help Daniel win by giving whatever you can to the MMS Health Freedom Defense Fund today.*

*Information on year-end charitable tax deductions available upon request.

Please share this GoFundMe campaign and the YouTube video below on your Twitter and Facebook accounts.  Thank you for all your vital help.

This fight is our fight.  It is the fight of thousands of us who use MMS and of course people who may want to use MMS in the future… Please everyone, give whatever you can to Daniel’s MMS Defense Fund today because it is really the defense fund for all of us.” ~ Jim Humble

“Daniel Smith and his family need our urgent financial help to win this legal battle they’ve been fighting on our behalf for the last two years.” ~ M.H., Florida, USA

“This is not just about MMS.  Every person who cares about health freedom needs to understand how the outcome of this case will impact not only our own lives, but the lives of our children, and our children’s children.” ~ R.J., Colorado, USA

“Thank you for standing, Daniel.  We are standing with you to leave this mark on history.  Together we will help make a difference that will positively impact the entire world.” ~ R.C., Washington, USA

Your contribution will help make a major difference in the outcome of Daniel’s trial.  Help save this father-of-four from 37 years of prison and tell the FDA to stay out of our homes!

Malaria Meets MMS: Ugandan Case Study

Background (2007-2013)

Little did Daniel know that four years after launching Project GreenLife, it would turn his life – and the lives of everyone he loved – upside down. Much of these life-altering and traumatic events are already subject of various articles published by independent news sources like the U.S. Observer, News with Views and Thought For Food.

What has not been well published is that in January of 2013, nearly two years after the armed raids, asset seizures, and a host of constitutional infringements, Daniel and his beloved partner Karis, along with two others, were indicted (and arrested) in the USA on a trumped-up six-count indictment charging violations of near century-old draconian food and drug law – each facing up to 37 years in prison.

Shortly after the charges were filed, Daniel and Karis were arrested by FDA agents who entered their home in Ashland Oregon on an early Monday morning while waking their daughter for school.  Armed agents loomed at the foot of their daughter’s bed while her parents consoled her with their hands cuffed behind their backs.

Young Miss Sabby was forced to leave her home and all her friends at the Waldorf School in Ashland to travel back to Spokane Washington where she would not see her parents again for almost a month – the time the government would take to extradite her parents from Oregon to Washington.

Sabrielle – “Sabby”

A Call for LOVE: The Matter of MMS, the FDA, and Daniel Smith by Adam Abraham

What was Daniel’s “Crime”?

Between 2007 and 2011, Project GreenLife made various alternative health products available online.  One product in particular was the water purifier used in the Ugandan pilot project (seen above).  This product is referred to throughout the world as “MMS”.

ProjectGreenLife Website (2011)

No Warning Letter ever issued from the FDA for any product carried by PGL, including MMS.

However, in 2010, PGL’s attorney, Nancy Lord, M.D., was contacted by the FDA following a surprise “regulatory inspection” in which the agency related their dislike for the product based upon claims by FDA science officers that would later prove by experts to be false.  The FDA “asked” PGL to conduct a “voluntary recall” of all MMS.

As a precautionary measure, and in an effort to avoid retaliation by the agency, PGL effected the “voluntarily recall.”

Shortly after, PGL underwent a reorganization into a private member association.  Prior to the reorganization, Daniel wrote the FDA and asked if they had any legal valid objection to their making their products available to private members under the First Amendment Right of Association clause.  The letter was sent to multiple FDA officials stating clearly that PGL would do so only if the FDA had no objection.  The FDA provided no objection leading PGL to believe they had none.

Rather than be forthcoming, FDA agents began sneaking around Daniel’s home and other properties taking photos, going through trash, and attaching warrantless GPS devices to vehicles.  Daniel would later learn that the FDA was creating a dossier for the purpose of convincing a federal magistrate to issue seizure warrants to allow the FDA to seize all of PGL’s assets.

It would not be until late June of 2011 when armed federal agents came from all over the country to take part in a well-organized raid of three locations: Daniel’s home, a bottling facility, and a fulfillment company.  The FDA also raided Daniel’s and the Association’s bank accounts, effectively putting PGL out of business in a single day.

Surely if the FDA had a valid legal objection or were genuinely concerned about people’s use of MMS, they would have answered PGL’s letter, rather than sit by while PGL made MMS available to its members for another year, all the while secretly planning the raids.

FDA’s Goal: Make an Example of Daniel and Teach the Health Freedom Movement that Nobody Stands Up to the FDA

What Exactly is “MMS” or Acidified Sodium Chlorite?

MMS (Miracle [Master] Mineral Solution) is a simple solution of sodium chlorite dissolved in distilled water.

Sodium chlorite is perfectly legal to buy, sell, import, export, and possess.  It is still available to this day on Ebay, Amazon, and from scores of online distributors worldwide.  It has been marketed throughout the world for nearly a century, most notably for use in water purification.

When mixed with weak acids, such as citric acid, sodium chlorite is a precursor to a dynamic array of redox molecules effective in the eradication of yeasts, molds, fungi, viruses, and bacteria, all which thrive in aqueous solutions (including human body water) and are a leading cause of various disease symptoms throughout the world.

Sodium chlorite, properly acidified, contains no residual sodium chlorite, as this is all spent in the reaction. Hence, alleged “dangers” of sodium chlorite is a misnomer.  The resultant chemistry, if and when ingested, breaks down internally to oxygen, sodium, and chloride – all essential nutrients for the sustenance of human life.

The Politics of “Your” Health

The archaic laws and overbroad policies of the FDA, which unquestionably favor large corporations, allow the agency to arbitrarily define what would otherwise constitute natural and ubiquitous substances as “drugs” whenever the agency declares their “intended use” to “mitigate, treat, cure, or prevent disease.”

In that sense, the FDA has become an agency that maintains and enforces what is, effectively, a monopoly over human health.

The absurdity of this proposition should be almost immediately obvious and, for those interested, a more in-depth analysis of the politics driving the machinery is provided at the bottom of this page.

The War on Health: The FDA’s Cult of Tyranny (Trailer)

Your Health Freedom vs. Their Special Interest

It was no surprise then when, in June of 2013 (after the arrests), sodium chlorite suddenly received “orphaned drug status” in the EU for the treatment of ALS (Lou Gehrig’s Disease).  See Sodium Chlorite (NP001) Receives Orphaned “Drug” Status in the European Union.

It was also no surprise to find that clinical studies were already under way for the use of sodium chlorite (designated “NP001″) in the treatment of Alzheimer’s, Multiple Sclerosis, and Parkinson’s.

Neither was it a surprise to find numerous patents – many based on clinical studies – for the use of acidified sodium chlorite in the safe and effective treatment of HIV, dermatologic and inflammatory diseases, infectious diseases, cancers, and diabetic ulcers, to name a few.  See also, Immunokine designated “WF10“.

More recently, the U.S. military has turned to sodium chlorite to generate chlorine dioxide (ClO2) to fight the spread of dread Ebola.

U.S. Army Natick Soldier Research, Development, and Engineering Center Using ClO2 to Combat Ebola

“Our ClO2 technology is being used in West Africa by various world health organizations, including the U.S. government, to sterilize items contaminated with the Ebola virus.”  Source:

On December 17, 2014, Genesis II reported the defeat of Ebola in Sierra Leone West Africa using MMS.

These late revelations merely confirm what Daniel Smith and others have known for some time, having themselves heard and been witness to thousands of testimonials and stories from all over the world.

While the FDA has had full knowledge of scientific studies and clinical data supporting the safe and effective use of acidified sodium chlorite for an increasing number of human health concerns, the agency along with the Department of Justice have together pretended that no such data exists – all the while referring to Daniel and his friends in the media as snake-oil salesmen in a coverup effort to demonize the personal use of acidified sodium chlorite.

This of course begs the question, just who are these agencies really working for?

MMS – 101 Household Uses

Sodium chlorite solution (MMS) has an untold number of household uses, not the least of which is to purify untreated well water or chlorinated city drinking water from carcinogenic THMs.

Chances are, you’ve already ingested acidified sodium chlorite if you’ve ever traveled to – or are lucky enough to live in – a city that already uses chlorine dioxide rather than chlorine to purify its water.   Is the FDA going after water municipalities?

Acidified MMS can be used in almost every room of a home… in the kitchen, to clean hard surfaces, meat, or store-bought vegetables; in the laundry, to eradicate odors; in the bedroom, to get rid of bed bugs; the bathroom, to kill shower mold and other germs; the basement, to get rid of mildew; and air ducts to neutralize mold spores.

The number of external uses for MMS acidified sodium chlorite far exceed the internal ones, but its the internal ones that pose the biggest threat to the pharmaceutical industry and are thus problematic for the FDA.

2010 propaganda photo taken by the FDA of MMS against a red backdrop to scare consumers away from personally acidifying their own sodium chlorite:

It doesn’t take long to see how Daniel and Project GreenLife, making a year’s worth of sodium chlorite solution available for pennies a day (as little as $10 a bottle) that consumers, in turn, could acidify for any one of a plethora of personal reasons, would awaken this less than sleeping giant.

“Daniel” vs. Goliath

Shortly after his arrest, Daniel Smith read a message etched into the cinder block walls of his jail cell, a message left by a former prisoner that read these simple words: “REMEMBER WHO YOU ARE.


Daniel pondered what it meant to remember who he was – starting with his given name, Louis Daniel.  Louis, he knew meant “Famous Warrior” and Daniel, “God is my judge.”  With that, Daniel knew he had to fight.

Because Daniel lacked adequate funds to hire a team of lawyers experienced in FDCA law – something the government made sure of by first seizing all his assets – the moment Daniel was released from jail, he entered his appearance in the case “pro se” – representing himself as his own attorney.

Over the course of two years (2013 – 2014), Daniel researched and filed upwards of 100 pleadings in the form of motions, responses, and replies, attacking jurisdiction, prosecutorial misconduct, discovery and constitutional violations, and various procedural errors.  These filings are all available on the public record.

Not surprising, the government-paid defense attorneys (for co-defendants) filed little to nothing, seemingly waiting for a palatable plea offer to avoid having to try a complex case.  It has since been learned that upwards of 97% of all cases never go to trial for this very reason.

THREE FELONIES A DAY – How the Feds Target the Innocent, by Harvey A. Silverglate

In his foreword of Silverglate’s “Three Felonies a Day“, Harvard Law professor, Alan M. Dershowitz writes:

“Harvey Silverglate, an experienced and astute criminal lawyer, makes a compelling case that federal prosecutors are abusing their power by using the criminal law to prosecute law abiding citizens whose conduct is arguably covered by extremely vague criminal statutes that are capable of reaching acts which are believed to be lawful by those who commit them.

“These prosecutors threatened to indict underlings for conduct that is even further away from the core of criminality unless they cooperate against the real targets.  Because federal criminal law carries outrageously high sentences – often with mandatory minimums – these prosecutorial threats are anything but illusory.  They turn friends into enemies, family members into government witnesses and employees into stool pigeons.

“Silverglate believes that we are in danger of becoming a society in which prosecutors alone become judges, juries and executioners because the threat of high sentences makes it too costly for even innocent people to resist the prosecutorial pressure. That is why nearly all criminal defendants today plead guilty to “reduced” charges rather than risk a trial with draconian sentences in the event of a conviction.”

Licensed to Lie – Exposing Corruption in the Department of Justice by Sidney Powell

“WHEN THE GUARDIANS OF JUSTICE BECOME THE PERPETRATORS OF INJUSTICE – Licensed to Lie is the story of the strong-arm, illegal, and unethical tactics used by headline-grabbing federal prosecutors in their narcissistic pursuit of power.”

Author, Sidney Powell, served in the Department of Justice for ten years in Texas and Virginia and has devoted her private practice to federal appeals for the past twenty years.  In Licensed to Lie, Powell leads readers through the disturbing missteps, cover-ups, malfeasance, and corruption of justice that have caused her to question the system she has been committed to for over thirty years.

“This book should serve as the beginning of a serious conversation about whether our criminal justice system continues to live up to its vaunted reputation.  As citizens of a free society, we all have an important stake in making sure that it does.” – From the Foreword by Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in his personal capacity.

Some Motions Filed By Daniel Smith

Over the last two years, Daniel has argued several of his motions before the judge.  Each time, under the guidance of those more experienced, Daniel’s level of confidence and presentation improved.  Seasoned attorneys commented that Daniel argued better than 90% of all other attorneys they’d seen.  Others agreed, Daniel had outargued the prosecution hands down. Nevertheless, the judge’s rulings always ended in one word: “DENIED“.

Where the prosecution faltered, the judge covered for the government.  Where the prosecution failed to argue, the judge argued for the government.  Where the prosecution filed false pleadings, the judge swept them under the rug.  When Daniel’s argument could not be easily overcome, it was omitted or liberally misconstrued to clear the way for a ruling in favor of the government.

This is the current state of our federal district courts in America.  The doctrine of Separation of Powers is an ideal that lost its way when the courts became embroiled in securitizing – and thus monetizing – the cases that it hears.

In summary, every attempt made by Daniel to obtain a just ruling was met with a clear and unmistakable demonstration of judicial bias.

Following one such denial, Karis wrote the following tender note to Daniel:

“I’m sorry the judge is so adversarial to you, specifically.  It’s not fair …  and I believe in my heart that you have the ability to see through it to a solution that really changes things for everyone.”

“You have become a warrior through all of this, and that is admirable, but remember that David had smooth stones and a soft heart.  Remember that your greatest gift in this world is your sweet heart.”

“I know this can’t be any help or comfort right now, but I suppose I’m just committed to reminding you of this over and over.  Who you are is not an angry, defiant, warring victim to the government.

“You are creative, visionary, generous, tender and loving.  Those are your five smooth stones.”  ~ Karis

Five Smooth Stones

Daniel’s Case Severed on Spurious Grounds : Co-Defendants “Plead Out”

On November 7, 2014, with trial less than 30 days out, after learning Daniel’s co-defendants had refused the government’s “plea offers”, the judge severed the case into two separate trials – one for Daniel and one for the remaining co-defendants – setting Daniel’s trial off by three months.  This effectively forced Daniel’s co-defendants into either pleading guilty to lesser charges, or risk going to trial in less than 30 days without Daniel – the only one preparing for trial.

The judge justified the ruling by falsely branding Daniel a “sovereign citizen” (the top domestic terrorist threat in America according to the Department of Homeland Security), asserting that Daniel’s co-defendants would be “prejudiced” if they had to go to trial with him.

Watching their attorneys do little-to-nothing for almost two years and the judge deny every one of Daniel’s motions in favor of the government, Daniel’s co-defendants were effectively forced into pleading guilty to lesser charges in order to avoid having to go to trial virtually alone, where the stakes were high and there were no guarantees of a fair trial.  They were told by their attorneys their pleas would likely mean no jail time.

As Harvard Law professor, Alan M. Dershowitz, pointed out, defendants in similar situations eventually “plead” not because they believe they have done anything wrong, but because the government effectively extorts from them a “lesser” conviction by threatening a heavy prison sentence and never seeing their families again.

As the prosecutor (Christopher E. Parisi) admitted to an attorney for one of Daniel’s co-defendants at the beginning of the case, “We know [your client] is not as culpable; it’s really Mr. Smith we’re after.”  This was in spite of charging her with 37 years as well.

Daniel’s Trial Currently Set for March 3, 2015

Daniel’s trial is now set for March, 3, 2015 – less than 90 days away.  The government has access to unlimited resources.  Daniel requires financial assistance to consult with highly experienced counsel and to pay for other legal expenses, including expert witnesses and transportation of witnesses from various locations around the world.

Experts say that Daniel’s case is winnable for several reasons that cannot be discussed in open forum.   Dr. Mary J. Ruwart wrote something about Daniel’s legal challenges in a 2010 article entitled, The FDA Wants Jurisdiction Over Your Kitchen!

Voir Dire – Questions the Government Intends to Ask Prospective Jurors

When selecting a jury, both parties are given an opportunity to ask questions to help identify and eliminate jurors that may exhibit a bias.

The prosecution has submitted a set of revealing questions it intends to ask the jury lending insight into the heart of this prosecution.

“1.  Do you believe the FDA protects the public health by making sure drugs are safe and effective for their intended uses?”  

If you answered NO to this question, the prosecutor would not want you on the jury.  This is in spite of the fact that statistics show 290 people are killed every day by FDA-approved prescription drugs.  Other statistics show that someone dies from FDA-approved drugs every 14 minutes.

“2.  Who here believes that a person who wants to sell a new drug to people as a cure for diseases should get FDA approval first by showing that it is safe and effective?”  

If you answered NO to this question, the prosecutor would not want you on the jury.  See what the UK thinks about FDA approved drugs vs. non-FDA approved supplements here; and how more than 60,000 people died from taking Vioxx alone – a drug the FDA found to be both “safe and effective”.

“3.  Do you believe that consenting adults should be allowed to buy and sell alternative medicines without interference from the FDA?”  

If you believe this, the prosecutor would not want you on the jury – or people like these men and women testifying before Congress.

“4.  Who thinks that the government cannot be trusted to protect the public health?”

If you think this, the prosecutor would not want you on the jury.  This is in spite of the fact that even the prestigious Harvard University Center for Ethics has found the FDA cannot be trusted.

“5. Do any of you believe that the FDA cares more about drug company profits than the public health?”

If you believe this, the prosecutor would not want you on the jury.  This is in spite of the fact that even the Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics (2013, Vol. 14, No. 3: 590-610) published that since 1906, heavy commercial influence has compromised legislation to protect the public from unsafe drugs and that the authorization of user fees in 1992 “turned drug companies into the FDA’s prime clients, deepening the regulatory and cultural capture of the agency.”  See Institutional Corruption of Pharmaceuticals and the Myth of Safe and Effective Drugs.  The prestigious journal further writes, “unless this corruption of regulatory intent is reversed, the situation will continue to deteriorate.”

“6.  Do any of you think that the FDA has blocked public access to effective medicines for improper reasons?”  

If you think this, the prosecutor would not want you on the jury.   This is in spite of evidence that the FDA does in fact block effective medicines.

“7.  Who agrees with the following statement: regular vaccinations protect the public against the spread of illnesses and diseases like chicken pox or measles?”

If you did not agree with this, the prosecutor would not want you on the jury.  This is in spite of the tremendous weight of evidence that vaccination is a fundamentally flawed science and causes more harm in our society than good.

“8.  Who here believes that children should not be required to get vaccinated in order to attend public school?”

If you believe this, the prosecutor would not want you on the jury.  Perhaps the most telling of all the questions, the prosecution here obviously believes that one’s right to not have themselves or their children injected with a neurotoxic cocktail containing heavy metals and foreign disease matter has no place in our society.

“9.  Does anyone here think that the government should not put fluoride in our drinking water?”

If you think this, the prosecutor would not want you on the jury.   This is in spite of copious evidence that fluoride is a poison that decreases the IQ of adults and children.

“10.  Would any of you have difficulty finding someone guilty if she committed a crime because she believed she was helping people?”  

If you answered yes to this, the prosecutor definitely would not want you on the jury.

In other words – if you are an informed, thinking, compassionate human being, the prosecutor would not want you on the jury!

What if Daniel Loses?

If Daniel loses this case, he could spend up to 37 years in federal prison.  In turn, the FDA will use its victory as a precedent to launch a campaign against resellers of sodium chlorite solution worldwide.  PGL was selectively targeted by the FDA to set an example.

MMS and sodium chlorite are still available today on Ebay, Amazon, and from scores of distributors throughout the the world; but not for long if the FDA gets their conviction.

Daniel is standing not only for his family but for all of us in the health freedom movement.  With the right legal team, the right experts, and a well-prepared defense, we can all win.  Without these, we all lose and Daniel goes to jail.  Any one of us could be next.

This is your opportunity to make a difference.

As the 1992 Libertarian Party Vice-Presidential Candidate, Attorney Nancy Lord, M.D., said on June 6, 1994 in closing argument in the famous case of FDA v. Roger Sless:

“Tell the FDA that you want them to leave Dr. Priestley and all of her colleagues in the supplement industry alone.  Tell the FDA to go back to Rockville, Maryland. Tell them to take their guns and their badges with them. Tell them that the only thing in this trial that isn’t safe and effective is the FDA.  Remember what Dr. Priestley said.  Those guns are loaded.  Somebody could get hurt…”

Source: Gift of Speech

A Letter from Daniel to Supporters

“Dear friends, words cannot express our family’s gratitude for all your prayers and support in the last seven years – particularly in the last three.

In 2012, many of you gave to a fund collected by Genesis II and/or the U.S. Observer, and many of you have continued to send support personally since.  Thank you.

Thousands of you, from all over the world, sent sworn declarations, some directly to the grand jury foreman, care of the prosecutor who, as it turns out, deliberately withheld them from the jury – though the government admits receiving them in a recent filing.  Nonetheless, thank you.

While the government’s allegations have tested our strength and resolve, it has been your continued and often unsolicited support that has reminded us we are not alone.

I realize I have been off-radar for a considerable amount of time. This has, in part, been due to sheer exhaustion.  When the government has marshaled considerable resources against you, it can be hard to get out of bed some mornings.

Its also been difficult because the prosecutor dragged my friends and family into harms way so I have felt compelled to keep a low profile so the government did not retaliate against them.

I am reminded as I type this email, I am wearing a government issued monitoring device, which has been married to my ankle for the last two years (a form of house arrest – a condition of my pre-trial release).

I’m attaching a photo of this clever device, which assures the government I am safe and sound in my home every night between 10:00 P.M. and 6:00 A.M.  In the beginning, it insured that I never left home at all – not even to the grocery.   Other than keeping me from going swimming with the kids, I hardly notice its there anymore.  This device communicates with an alien-looking GPS-device that sits on top of our piano.

A lot has changed in the MMS universe since 2011, but the challenges we face in the health freedom movement are not limited to MMS.

There are some who would say that, since its inception, the FDA has abused legal process to limit the availability of all manner of safe, effective, and affordable alternatives to allopathic medicine.  Never has the “business of cancer”, for example, been so well documented as in the case of Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski, M.D., Ph.D.

Burzynski: Cancer Is Serious Business (Trailer)

Attorney Nancy Lord, M.D. once argued in her closing of the famous Roger Sless trial:

[Start quote.] “The idea of government control of medicine occurred to two people — Benjamin Rush, George Washington’s personal doctor and a signer of the Declaration of Independence, and Thomas Jefferson.

“Benjamin Rush warned: ‘Unless we put medical freedom into the Constitution, the time will come when medicine will organize into an undercover dictatorship… To restrict the art of healing to one class of men and deny equal privileges to others will constitute the Bastille of medical science.  All such laws are un-American and despotic and have no place in a republic… The Constitution of this republic should make special privilege for medical freedom as well as religious freedom.’

“The Founders guaranteed that we would remain free of government interference in our choice of religion.  When the founders wrote the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, they knew that government would try to dictate religion, because it always had.

“But in spite of Dr. Rush’s prophetic warning, the right to freedom in our choice of health care is not part of the Bill of Rights.  The founders never imagined that a trial such as this would ever take place in America.  Because they never thought the federal government would even attempt to control what we keep in our medicine cabinets and kitchen cabinets.  There was no such thing as the FDA until 1906, when the Pure Food and Drugs Act permitted the government to seize dangerous substances.  Then in 1938 they required that safety data be submitted for evaluation.  In 1962, all of those products and any new ones had to submit data on effectiveness and wait until the FDA approved the drug before it could be marketed.”  [End quote.]

Friends, 2015 will be a decisive year for all of us. Ultimately, our success depends upon our ability to gain support in this eleventh hour.  We have reached the end of our own resources, but have so much more to accomplish in the next 90 days.  Although we are on the homestretch, we still need substantial funding to see this through.

Many of you have helped us before, and this has made it possible for us to fight the battle up to now.  If you’ve ever thought of contributing more to help preserve our right to health freedom, now is the time.

The results of this campaign will determine not only my own family’s future but the future of MMS, and help establish an important trajectory in the health freedom movement.  Please stand with us in solidarity at this critical time.

I hope to write more of the journey soon, and to give those who remain interested, a glimpse into the countless miracles that have sustained us – no doubt, because of all your prayers and support.

Thank you for everything.

Daniel Smith
c/o: 1314 S. Grand Blvd. Ste 2-128
Spokane, Washington 99202
+001 (509) 590-2188
Skype: shuzammy

A Prayer Warrior’s Vision

More About Daniel and Karis

Daniel and Karis founded Project GreenLife in 2007, a vision that began in 2004 when Daniel’s biological mother suddenly passed after being poorly diagnosed – left to starve on a hospital bed in the advance stages of cancer.

When Daniel inquired regarding the hospital’s inattentiveness to his mother’s nutritional requirements, her doctor replied, “I eat Twinkies and drink Coca-Cola. I’m a medical doctor.  I know nothing about nutrition.” Daniel would later learn that many practicing MD’s never receive more than an hour of nutritional education during medical training.  This launched Daniel on a course that eventually led to Project GreenLife.

Daniel and Karis have four children, two girls, two boys (ages 10-22), and one grandson.  Karis is a natural healer, versed in various modalities including Massage, Directed Breath and Matrix Energetics.  Daniel and Karis home-schooled all three of their children for their early years.

Daniel’s first love has always been music.  You can hear him perform one of his songs here:  Peace Be Still

Today I Woke Up – Daniel Smith-Votino

Politics of Sodium Chlorite (continued from above)

The archaic laws and overbroad policies of the FDA allow it to arbitrarily declare less novel (and thus less patentable) substances “drugs” whenever the agency decides the “intended use” of the substance is to “mitigate, treat, cure, or prevent disease”.

The absurdity of this proposition should be almost immediately obvious, for this suggests the agency may convert, for example, a standard household toilet into a “medical device”, for the purposes of regulating, or Vitamin C for the treatment of scurvy into a “drug”, water for the treatment of dehydration the same and, invariably, water purification drops such as MMS into a “drug”, because these all “prevent disease” in one way or another.

In turn, the law declares that any interstate transfer of such a device or substance (or any component thereof) absent a near half billion dollar right-of-passage fee to the agency (i.e., a “drug application fee”) to be an “infamous crime” – that is, if the agency should find a technical error in the labeling such to declare the article “misbranded”.

Not surprisingly, it was the pharmaceutical companies that first lobbied Congress for such high barriers to entry – the purpose of which to keep “the little guy” from entering the market with products that could take billions from publicly traded companies.  This is the lifeblood of the FDA and the trillion dollar sickness industry that props a failing world economy.

In short, it is the “public policy” of the FDA to protect “public health”, which really means protecting publicly traded companies from potential losses.  In this sense, the FDA is fulfilling its prime directive perfectly when it suppresses affordable alternatives, but it does so at the expense of your personal health and freedom.

Please give today.   With your help, we can achieve a successful outcome in this struggle we all share against this modern day Goliath.

Please share this GoFundMe campaign on Twitter and Facebook.


Go to top